Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorErisen, Fehmi Raif
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorErsev, Handan
dc.contributor.authorOzcan-Caliskan, Ece
dc.contributor.authorPehlivanoglu, Erdal
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T11:22:34Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T11:22:34Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationErsev H., Yilmaz B., Pehlivanoglu E., Ozcan-Caliskan E., Erisen F. R. , "Resistance to Vertical Root Fracture of Endodontically Treated Teeth with MetaSEAL", JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, cilt.38, ss.653-656, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_a7d9e66c-629a-4ecf-a478-1c1e061f9e1a
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/112197
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.015
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of MetaSEAL and AH Plus on the resistance to vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth when either the matched-taper single-cone or lateral condensation technique was used. Methods: Ninety extracted single-canal mandibular premolar teeth were sectioned, leaving a standard root length of 13 mm. The buccolingual and mesiodistal diameters were measured, and the teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 15). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the diameters. In group 1, no instrumentation or obturation was performed. The rest of the roots were chemo-mechanically prepared with nickel-titanium,ProTaper rotary instruments up to size F3 at the working length. Group 2 was left unobturated. Groups 3 and 4 were obturated with AH Plus used with the matched-taper single-cone and lateral condensation techniques, respectively. In groups 5 and 6, MetaSEAL was used instead of AH Plus. All of the roots were mounted vertically in self-curing acrylic resin blocks that exposed 8 mm of the corona! part. Then the roots were subjected to a vertical loading force (1 mm/min). The force required to produce a fracture was recorded in newtons. The data were analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis and post hoc Dunn multiple comparison tests (P < .05). Results: Although we did not detect statistical significance, there was a substantial difference between the fracture resistance values of the intact and instrumented but not obturated roots. The groups in which AH Plus and MetaSEAL were used with the matched-taper single-cone technique showed significantly higher fracture resistance values than the instrumented but not obturated roots (P < .05). There were no significant differences between the groups submitted to the matched-taper single-cone technique. The force required to fracture the roots in the group treated with AH Plus and the lateral condensation technique was similar to that required to fracture intact roots, whereas the group treated with MetaSEAL and the lateral condensation technique revealed comparable values to the instrumented but not obturated roots. Conclusions: When used with the matched-taper single-cone technique, MetaSEAL and AH Plus have the potential to reinforce endodontically treated teeth. (J Endod 2012:38:653-656)
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.titleResistance to Vertical Root Fracture of Endodontically Treated Teeth with MetaSEAL
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage653
dc.identifier.endpage656
dc.contributor.firstauthorID54298


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster