Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTugrul, M
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, NM
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Merve
dc.contributor.authorDilek, A
dc.contributor.authorCamci, E
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, E
dc.contributor.authorPembeci, Kamil
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T11:11:29Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T11:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationSenturk N., Dilek A., Camci E., Senturk E., Orhan M., Tugrul M., Pembeci K., "Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilatory and oxygenation parameters during pressure-controlled one-lung ventilation", JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, cilt.19, ss.71-75, 2005
dc.identifier.issn1053-0770
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_a6f86134-d310-4127-a558-774229806377
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/111630
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2004.11.013
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of PEEP on oxygenation and airway pressures during PCV-OLV. Design: Randomized, crossover, clinical study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Twenty-five patients undergoing thoracotomy. Interventions: During the first 5 minutes of OLV, all patients were ventilated with VCV (PEEP: 0) (VCV-ZEEP). Afterward, ventilation was changed to PCV with PEEP: 0 (PCV-ZEEP) or PEEP: 4 cmH(2)O (PCV-PEEP) for 20 minutes. In the following 20 minutes, PCV-PEEP and PCV-ZEEP were applied in reverse sequence. Measurements and Main Results: At the end of VCV-ZEEP airway pressures (peak airway pressure, plateau airway pressure, mean airway pressure, and pause airway pressure) were recorded. At the end of PCV-PEEP and PCV-ZEEP air-way pressures, PaO2 and Qs/Qt were recorded. Ppeak and Pplat were significantly lower with PCV-PEEP compared with VCV-ZEEP (eg, Ppeak: 33.4 +/- 4.2,28.3 +/- 4.1, and 28.9 +/- 3.7 cmH(2)O in VCV-ZEEP, PCV-ZEEP, and PCV-PEEP, respectively; p < 0.05 for PCV-ZEEP v VCV-ZEEP and PCV-PEEP v VCV-ZEEP). PCV-PEEP was associated with an increased PaO2 (230.3 +/- 69.8 v 189.0 +/- 54.8 mmHg, p < 0.05) and decreased Qs/Qt (33.4% +/- 7.3% v 38.4% +/- 5.7%, p < 0.05) compared with PCV-ZEEP (mean SD). Eighty-eight percent of the patients have benefited from PEEP. Conclusion: During OLV, PCV with a low level of PEEP leads to improved oxygenation with lower airway pressures. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKardiyoloji
dc.subjectANESTEZİYOLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectCARDIAC ve CARDIOVASCULAR SİSTEMLER
dc.subjectSOLUNUM SİSTEMİ
dc.subjectPERİFERAL VASKÜLER HASTALIĞI
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectAnesteziyoloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectGöğüs Hastalıkları ve Allerji
dc.titleEffects of positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilatory and oxygenation parameters during pressure-controlled one-lung ventilation
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage71
dc.identifier.endpage75
dc.contributor.firstauthorID6408


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster