Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Guler
dc.contributor.authorUgras, Gulay Altun
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T10:29:24Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T10:29:24Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationUgras G. A. , Aksoy G., "The Effects of Open and Closed Endotracheal Suctioning on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: A Crossover, Single-Blind Clinical Trial", JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING, cilt.44, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0888-0395
dc.identifier.otherav_a359925d-1de0-44e8-b5c7-89c1d211cbb3
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/109345
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/jnn.0b013e3182682f69
dc.description.abstractAlthough endotracheal suctioning is a routine nursing intervention, this procedure can lead to an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP). This study was planned to determine the appropriate suctioning technique (open system suctioning [OS] and closed system suctioning [CS]) to minimize variability of ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in neurologically impaired patients. The study, which was designed as a crossover, single-blind clinical trial, consisted of 32 neurosurgical patients who underwent ICP monitoring, intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring, and endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit. According to the need for suctioning, each patient in the experimental and control groups underwent suctioning with both closed and open systems. Recordings were composed of the patients' ICP, mean arterial blood pressure, CPP, heart rate (HR), and arterial blood gases during suctioning. It was observed that both suctioning techniques significantly increased ICP, mean arterial blood pressure, CPP, and HR; ICP was found to be significantly higher in OS compared with CS, whereas there were no significant differences in CPP and HR between the two techniques. The patients suctioned using OS had significantly lower mean PaO2 than those suctioned using CS; however, the comparison of the two techniques revealed no significant differences in PaCO2. The data obtained indicate that CS, compared with OS, can be used safely on this patient group.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectHemşirelik
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectHEMŞİRELİK
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.titleThe Effects of Open and Closed Endotracheal Suctioning on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: A Crossover, Single-Blind Clinical Trial
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING
dc.contributor.departmentHaliç Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.contributor.firstauthorID207056


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record