Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Hafize Emine
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Figen
dc.contributor.authorCakan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorTanatar, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorAyaz, Nuray
dc.contributor.authorKaradag, Serife Gul
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T21:21:46Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T21:21:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAyaz N., Karadag S. G. , Cakmak F., Cakan M., Tanatar A., Sonmez H. E. , "Leflunomide treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.", Rheumatology international, cilt.39, sa.9, ss.1615-1619, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0172-8172
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_0682cebc-8f6a-48f2-9156-6aaf564fbd49
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/10228
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04385-7
dc.description.abstractJuvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common chronic rheumatic disease of childhood resulting in disability in untreated cases. Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs form the first-line treatment in JIA. However, the data about leflunomide (LFN) in treatment of JIA is limited. We reviewed the medical files of JIA patients who were followed-up regularly and had received LFN. A total of 38 patients were included to the study. Among them, 24 had oligoarticular JIA, eleven had polyarticular JIA, two had ERA and one had psoriatic arthritis. 36 were initially treated with methotrexate and two patients diagnosed with ERA were treated with sulfasalazine. Sulfasalazine treatment was switched to LFN due to inadequate response at the 3rd month of therapy. Methotrexate was ceased due to gastrointestinal intolerance in 36 patients. Of these 36 patients, 19 patients had either low disease activity (n = 13) or remission (n = 6). LFN was administered to 13 patients with low disease activity. During the follow-up of the six patients in remission, relapse ensued and LFN treatment was started. The remaining 17 patients had moderate (n = 10) or high (n = 7) disease activity requiring biologic agents. But due to inadequate response to biologic agents, LFN was added to the therapy. All of the patients were clinically inactive at the last visit. Only two adverse events resolving within 2 weeks were noted (Lymphopenia = 1, elevated liver enzymes = 1). LFN may be an alternative therapy in case of MTX intolerance or toxicity.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectİmmünoloji ve Romatoloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectROMATOLOJİ
dc.titleLeflunomide treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalRheumatology international
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage1615
dc.identifier.endpage1619
dc.contributor.firstauthorID267473


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record