• Türkçe
    • English
  • Türkçe 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   Açık Erişim Ana Sayfası
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • Öğe Göster
  •   Açık Erişim Ana Sayfası
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of the Cytogenetic and Molecular Analyses in the Assessment of Imatinib Response in Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia

Tarih
2009
Yazar
Cefle, Kivanc
Bayrak, Aysegul
Sirma, Sema
Yenerel, Mustafa Nuri
Diz-Kucukkaya, Reyhan
Sargin, Deniz
Pekcelen, Yuksel
Ucur, Ali
Ozturk, Sukru
Vural, Burcak
Nalcaci, Meliha
Yavuz, Selim
Ozbek, Ugur
Palanduz, Sukru
Besisik, Sevgi
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını göster
Özet
We aimed to compare the cytogenetic and molecular analyses in the assessment of imatinib mesylate response in patients suffering the chronic phase of chronic myelocytic leukemia who were refractory to a-interferon treatment. A total of 117 patients in the chronic phase of chronic myelocytic leukemia were included. The patients were treated with 400 mg/day imatinib mesylate. Bone marrow samples were obtained for the cytogenetic and molecular analyses. Patients without the Ph chromosome were defined as complete cytogenetic responders. Partial cytogenetic response was determined when the Ph chromosome was detected in 1-35% of the cells. Molecular response was determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QR-PCR) and defined as no detection of BCR-ABL mRNA. The frequencies of complete and partial cytogenetic response were 29% (n = 34) and 15% (n = 18), respectively. No cytogenetic response was achieved in 56% (n = 65) of the patients. Molecular response was achieved in 62% (n = 21) and 33% (n = 6) of the complete and partial cytogenetic responders, respectively. All of the 65 patients with no cytogenetic response were also molecular nonresponders. We conclude that there is reasonable agreement between the cytogenetic and molecular analyses. Both methods are complementary in the assessment of response to therapy.
Bağlantı
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/140408
https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2009.0055
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=74049149424&origin=inward
Koleksiyonlar
  • Makale [92796]

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


Hakkımızda
Açık Erişim PolitikasıVeri Giriş Rehberleriİletişim
sherpa/romeo
Dergi Adı/ISSN || Yayıncı

Exact phrase only All keywords Any

BaşlıkbaşlayaniçerenISSN

Göz at

Tüm DSpaceBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTürlere GöreBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTürlere Göre

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV