• Türkçe
    • English
  • Türkçe 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   Açık Erişim Ana Sayfası
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • Öğe Göster
  •   Açık Erişim Ana Sayfası
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Replicability and reliability of pain assessment forms in geriatrics

Tarih
2011
Yazar
Tezcan, Vecdet
Karadag, Berrin
Beger, Tanju
BILICI, Ahmet
Doventas, Alper
Sut, Necdet
Curgunlu, Asli
Erdincler, Deniz Suna
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını göster
Özet
Aim of the study was to investigate the replicability and reliability of the multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) in young and elderly individuals with chronic pain. Ambulatory patients, 20 of them aged above 65 years and complaining about chronic pain and 20 patients with the age of 40 and younger working in a factory were assessed with VAS and MDHAQ. The assessment was repeated to investigate the replicability and reliability of both tests. According to MDHAQ disability index (DI), the elderly had more complains on the first and second day of the study (p < 0.001). In terms of changes between first and second days, DI scores of the elderly group (r = 0.634; p = 0.003) and the younger group (r = 0.888; p < 0.001) had quite similar responses. Criteria for the assessment of pain, fatigue and general condition according to MDHAQ were similar in both groups in terms of changes between first and second day of the study, there was no significant differences between the groups. But while responses in the younger group according to these 3 parameters were highly reliable, the elderly group's responses were reliable only for their last week pain assessment. Both tests were replicable in the elderly group, VAS and MDHAQ were especially applicable for the last time phase of their pain; while fatigue, general health condition and DI indicated diminished reliability in the elderly group, compared to the young group. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Bağlantı
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/100061
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.10.017
Koleksiyonlar
  • Makale [92796]

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


Hakkımızda
Açık Erişim PolitikasıVeri Giriş Rehberleriİletişim
sherpa/romeo
Dergi Adı/ISSN || Yayıncı

Exact phrase only All keywords Any

BaşlıkbaşlayaniçerenISSN

Göz at

Tüm DSpaceBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTürlere GöreBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTürlere Göre

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV